Examinations of files that are already circulating in public.
We run the same published method on files anyone can fetch, and we leave the dossier up as a permanent page. Cite the permalink, argue with the signals, check the method version. If a finding is inconclusive, it stays inconclusive here.
- Inconclusive
A 2013 Olympus street portrait from Wikimedia Commons, examined against the published checklist
An ordinary street photograph carrying Olympus E-M5 metadata, a 2013 capture date and a later Photoshop edit trace. The control case: what four layers say about a file whose own claims hold up.
- file
- Elderly_man_in_Rhodes,_Greece_(black_and_white).jpg
- sha-256
- b0325e8deae09350…
- examined
- 2026-08-31
- method
- 2026.08
- Signs of synthesis or manipulation
A synthetic portrait published on Wikimedia Commons, examined against the published checklist
Commons documents this file as a generated portrait of a virtual influencer. We ran the same four layers we run for a newsroom over it, and left every signal, and every limit, on the page.
- file
- Jeyla_Shore_virtual_influencer_2026.png
- sha-256
- 75190f5c352dae3c…
- examined
- 2026-08-31
- method
- 2026.08
The provenance layer runs free on anything you drop.
Metadata, Content Credentials and container fingerprints, in about a minute. A full dossier — four layers, findings, next steps, permalink — is $19 a case.
Drop a file